Best Tennis Players
Subcategorized are those who represented East Germany and West Germany. Contents. Top · 0–9 · A B C D E F G H I J K L M. Best Tennis players are born in oshotoarts.comd Edition Tee available in different colors and styles, choose your favorite one from the available products menù. The Best Tennis Players are born in September: great gift on any occasion. You can fill the notebook with all of your most precious thoughts, plans. «cm x.
Category:German male tennis playersDespite the challenge, here is my list of the ten greatest male tennis players of the Open Era - to present. Not only has Federer had a 5 year head and Subcategorized are those who represented East Germany and West Germany. Contents. Top · 0–9 · A B C D E F G H I J K L M. Each of the players reviewed on this list is incredible and could arguably be labeled the best tennis player of all time in their own right. An international panel of.
Best Tennis Players HOW WE Ranked the Players VideoATP Stars Build the Perfect Tennis Player! Laver won the calendar-year grand slam twice — as an amateur in and as a pro in Barton is Poker King Texas Holdem known for making the Second Round at the Wimbledon Championships after having qualified for the main draw. Novak is points clear of Rafael Nadal, with a massive chance to Fcn Live more fuel to that gap in Cincinnati and especially at the US Open in the next two weeks, failing to reach the quarters in New Star Stable Spiel a Ac Casino Bonus Codes ago. Men Women. Andre Agassi Getty Images. Steve Swaper. John Isner. Milos Raonic. 10/11/ · It was then that tennis really became more of a mainstream sport than a sport for the privileged, especially here in the United States. With the likes of Jimmy Connors, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe, Chris Evert, and others, there were plenty of personalities to fuel the rivalries that took place on and off the court. 3/9/ · Each of the players reviewed on this list is incredible and could arguably be labeled the best tennis player of all time in their own right. Numerically, Roger Federer has won the most Men’s Single Grand Slam titles, while Serena Williams technically outpaces him . Official tennis singles rankings of men's professional tennis on the ATP Tour, featuring Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer, Dominic Thiem and more. Considered by many to be the greatest tennis player in history, Aussie Rod Laver (aka “The Rocket”) won tournaments, the most in tennis history, plus 11 Grand Slams, and was No. 1 in the world from to To date, Laver remains the only player to have twice won all four Grand Slam singles tournaments during the same calendar year. After Margaret Court, who is the greatest female tennis player of all time with 64 Grand Slam titles (24 in singles, 19 in doubles and 21 in mixed doubles), the second greatest female tennis player of all time is Martina Navratilova, who has 59 Grand Slam titles (18 in singles, 31 in doubles, and 10 in mixed doubles). Jeremy on May 15, One of the most important athletes right now, Federer, deserves the top place in the list of the greatest tennis players. He has achieved 20 Grand Slam titles till now, a record on its own. Besides winning the title for that many times, he also has the record for participating in the 36 quarterfinals of the Grand Slam. Dennis Ralston, a five-time Grand Slam doubles champion who was one of the initial players signed to the professional World Championship Tennis tour in the s and a member of the sport's Hall. Greatest of All Time was a sports television series of five one-hour episodes, produced and first aired by the Tennis Channel in March It presented a list of tennis players to be considered the greatest of all time, both men and women. The series was hosted by Jack Nicklaus, Jerry Rice, Wayne Gretzky, Lisa Leslie and Carl Lewis.
Just my opinion and speculation, but I think that's how it will end up when their playing days are over. Question: Is Federer facing difficulties with younger tennis players such as Anderson?
Answer: At Wimbledon Roger Federer let a two set lead over Kevin Anderson get away from him and wound up losing in five sets in the quarter-finals.
Anderson at age 32 is no youngster by tennis standards, but Federer, at 36 is still able to compete at a high level against younger players.
Question: Don't you feel Boris Becker deserves to be in the top three of male tennis players? Answer: No, I do not feel that Boris Becker should be in the top three all-time.
I think Becker, who certainly was a great player is more of a top 15 player all-time. Question: Why are Grand Slams given such importance when determining the greatest men's tennis players of all time?
Grand Slam success, given its five-set nature, demonstrates how good your physical conditioning is, not how good a tennis player you are.
Answer: I suppose it's because Grand Slams are the events that draw all of the top players, which makes them the most competitive tournaments.
I do think that the five-set match is a fair determination of who is better in a head to head match, and certainly, a player's level of physical conditioning is an important part of how good a player they are.
If you take the player's physical conditioning out of the equation then what do they play? Best of three sets?
How about just a single set and the winner moves on? Physical conditioning is just one part of the equation along with all of the other things that make a player great; speed, agility, mental toughness, shot selection, strategy, etc.
Answer: Andy Murray has some work to do before he can be considered in the top 10 all-time. Question: Why is Boris Becker not in the list of the top 10 greatest men's tennis players?
Answer: Boris Becker was a great tennis player. He had a great career, but with just 6 Grand Slam titles, 49 ATP titles, and only 12 weeks ranked number 1 in the world, I think he is more a top all-time player than a top Question: Do you feel the fact that playing surfaces are more similar than they used to be e.
Answer: I think the best players will rise to the top no matter the surface. Certainly some players excel on specific surfaces such as Nadal on clay and Federer on faster surfaces, but these players can compete on any surface.
I do think that Federer and Nadal are the cream of the crop, although it is difficult to compare players of different generations and playing styles.
I think Roger and Rafael are racking up more slams because they are playing longer and are able to maintain a high level of play despite aging.
Question: Roger or Rafa will probably go down as the greatest male tennis players of all time. Certainly the current generation of players including Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic along with perhaps Murray and Wawrinka at times would be one.
Certainly a formidable collection of greats. And perhaps my favorite era, at least to watch, would be Connors, McEnroe, and Borg along with a few years later Wilander and then Lendl although he was really mid to late s.
Tough call. The s really was a great time for tennis. As the years go by sometimes we tend to overlook or forget just how good the level of competition was.
I think the number of players capable of winning a Grand Slam title was probably never better than the s. Answer: I have actually been considering including Rosewall in this top 10 list recently.
I only saw him play at the end of his career, but after reviewing his record, I do think it would be appropriate to include him.
Look for an updated list in the next few weeks that will include Ken Rosewall. How many depends on how long they play and how healthy they stay.
With Nadal's dominance at the French Open, I can see him winning multiple more titles there. If he plays long enough he could approach 25 Grand Slam titles although that might be a reach.
Question: I would like to know how many people are employed around a single tennis player. I have read somewhere that top players have over 60 people on their team?
If this is true, then, can we compare era in tennis? Lower ranked players simply cannot pay for a large entourage and therefore may have a team of just a few.
The highest ranked players who earn the most can afford to have multiple coaches, fitness experts, cooks, etc. A team of 60 sounds high to me, but certainly, the top players are surrounded by a large contingent.
Obviously, the technology of tennis racquets and the fitness level of players today is much more advanced than it was 50 years ago.
This certainly is a big reason why it is so difficult to compare players of different generations. Question: Shouldn't Poncho Gonzalez be included in a list of the ten greatest men's tennis players of all time?
Answer: I debated whether to include Rosewall or Gonzalez in the top ten and certainly, a case can be made to include both. Head to head Gonzalez had the advantage, but he was older and more experienced when Rosewall first started making a name for himself.
Both had long careers, well over titles, and were ranked number 1 in the world for many years. Perhaps at some point, I will re-evaluate?
Answer: No, Roger Federer is just being more selective with the tournaments that he enters. He has decided to skip the French Open to prepare for Wimbledon.
Answer: Pete Sampras officially retired on August 25, at the age of 32, although his last match was at the US Open, which he won.
Some players are capable of playing well into their thirties and despite still playing at a high level he had slowed a bit and decided to call it a career.
Good for him for ending his career on a high note with a Grand Slam title. Question: At the top three positions for men's tennis players, what do you think the list will look like in five years?
Answer: Five years from now I think the top three will still be Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic, but I think the order will be different from what we have today.
Presumably, Federer will be retired by then, possibly also Nadal, but we will have to wait and see. Should be some great tennis in the years ahead.
Question: Do you believe Alexander Zverev will be on this list by the end of his career? He has shown that he is capable of beating anyone including Federer and Djokovic.
Answer: Boris Becker was a great tennis player, just not top With 6 Grand Slam titles, 49 career titles, and a number 1 ranking for only twelve weeks it's hard to place him in the top Top 15, most definitely.
Question: Probably not in the top 10 but I'd be interested to know where you would place Guillermo Vilas? It was before my time, but it sounds like he could match it with Connors and the like.
Answer: Vilas was a great player. I had the pleasure of watching him play many times and he could certainly compete with anyone.
I would probably place him in the top 20, maybe even top Answer: I think John Newcombe is very close to the top 10 of all time. Certainly, he is in the top 12 or 13 at worst, and some might even include him in the top Seven Grand Slam singles titles plus an amazing seventeen Grand Slam doubles titles are pretty impressive.
Answer: Marcelo Rios was a very good player, just nowhere near the top 10 all-time. He was briefly ranked number 1 in the world in , but he failed to win a Grand Slam championship and has only 18 career titles to his resume.
His best Grand Slam result was reaching the finals of the Australian Open, which he lost to Petr Korda in straight sets. Answer: John McEnroe was a great tennis player.
He won seven Grand Slam titles and was the number 1 ranked player in the world for weeks during his career.
I was fortunate to have been able to watch McEnroe during his entire career, and he had some memorable matches against the other greats of his era including Jimmy Connors, Bjorn Borg, and Ivan Lendl.
Question: Why is your top 10 missing Pancho Gonzalez on the list? He was 1 in the world for 8 years. Answer: Roger Federer has won 20 Grand Slam singles titles as of the end of It is the greatest test of all, with best of 5 set matches.
May the best of those 3 players end up with the most Grand Slam singles titles. I am sure those 3 players will agree to it. The best professional tennis players take the Grand Slam singles titles the most seriously.
Year end number 1 or a great number of weeks at number 1 is nice for the top players, but they would happily trade it for an extra Grand Slam singles title.
Of course, the other tournaments just prior to the Grand Slam tournaments are mainly just practice or preparation for the top players, should they choose to play them.
Many of these top players even choose to skip these tournaments prior to the Grand Slam tournaments as they prefer to rest or simply practice with their coach or practice partners.
With the exception of the Coronavirus, most top players build their tennis career around playing the Grand Slam tournaments and anything else they may achieve is simply a bonus, not the main priority for them.
The overlooked selection criteria for GOAT, if we are only comparing the tennis careers of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic, needs to be taken into account, as the great Rod Laver was in a completely different era as far as racquets, professionalism, technology, coaches and entourages were concerned:.
If the above points are not addressed, then you can only go by the number of Grand Slam singles titles won by each player after they have all stopped competing in Grand Slam singles tournaments because unfortunately injuries are part of the game and Federer has been the least injury prone of the 3 for their careers.
Poor Murray of late and Del Potro for most of his tennis career can attest to this misfortune. When you start GOAT debate But when you have three players around same time Big three then grand slam titles are good indicator who is better player.
In my opinion all three players failed to capture substantial GS title lead. So neither of big three can claim they were best even current era.
Djokovic: most dominant at his peak while having toughest comeptition than Federer in , He loves to eat grass lol. Djokovic wins, because he is more versatile.
Nobody have to agree with my opinion. Even Ivan Lendl. I just present my opinion which is a bit different to GS dogma.
If you want you can laugh at my ideas. I typed that it is not real because underestimates Nadal. In practice it is almost impossible to stay at No 1 without any current GS title.
My simplified statistics is also suitable for anticipation of the future. Of course future is unnown, but I can try to draw some conclusion.
My simplified statistics show that in my opinion:. Difference in GS between them could be a matter of luck or injury. No of weeks couldn't.
I will send here my simplified statistics after each GS tournament with comments. You don't have to reply. For me, the only statistic that will matter in the end who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles out of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic after all 3 players have retired.
Write any load of nonsense you want, hhfan. That will make the happiest person in the world. Most tennis fans will remember and will remember in the years to come who won the most Grand Slam singles titles, not who finished the year end number 1, not who won the Master Series Events, not who won the Davis Cup, and so on.
HHfan, you cannot be serious! The question is who will end up winning the equal or greatest number of Grand Slam singles titles in the shortest timeframe.
Complete nonsense HHfan. Really, that is the most laughable, ridiculous and most absurd suggestion I have ever heard in my life when you typed 52 weeks at number 1 equates to 4 Grand Slam singles titles.
In my mind, that equates to no Grand Slam singles titles! Really, you are living in a fantasy world. Back to the Tennis History lecture theatre for you.
Winning an equal number of the most Grand Slam singles titles in a shorter time frame is the best statistic. Congratulations Mickey Donev. Both you and Ivan Lendl make the most sense and the best suggestions.
Mickey Donev makes a brilliant point, which I have been dwelling on for years, is about winning the Grand Slam singles titles in a shorter time frame.
The fact that Nadal has won only 1 less Grand Slam singles title than Federer in 20 less Grand Slam singles tournaments is a magnificent achievement by Nadal.
Well said, Mickey. That particular statistic says a lot. Hhfan, your statistical data are purely based on assumption. They are unproven in a Tennis environment.
There is no such thing as a GOAT. You cannot compare different eras, no matter what statistical data you wish to use.
I strongly believe you can only go by who ends up with the most Grand Slam singles titles after all 3 have retired. I shall keep repeating that over and over again.
Ivan Lendl and I only want to deal with the reality of facts of who ends up winning the most Grand Slam singles titles. It would not matter to me if you or anyone else in this article were in reality, the best experts in statistical analysis in the world.
Everyone in this article is entitled to their own opinion. Regardless of what you write and I understand this is an article about fantasy GOAT rankings, I still only care about who will end up with the reality of the most Grand Slam singles titles, after all 3 of Federer, Djokovic and Nadal have retired.
It would not matter to me if you or anyone else were the lecturer trying to explain your theory to me in different ways for a whole semester or more.
Ivan Lendl and I are only interested in who ends with the most Grand Slam singles titles. I am not saying you or your anyone else are wrong, I am simply saying I want to see who wins the most Grand Slam singles titles.
GOAT is not even in my vocabulary. When you take under consideration GS titles only - player A wins. For me GS statistics is oversimplified.
The 9th is Agassi with weeks. From the statistical point of view 1 year 52 weeks at No 1 is a very similar achevement to 4 Grand Slams!!!
Of course from the attention of the crowd or commercial matters perspective GS titles are much much more important than ATP rank.
Also players care much more about GS. Nadal is underestimated here. That's why I think Nole has a slightly more chances specially if he develop his attack game near the net like "late" RF did.
There are lot of parameters that were not taken into consideration. GS equals points, Masters , Tour Finals is etc.
You can't just ignore the other big tournaments. Another factor is the success rate. If one player wins 5 GS in 20 years of pro career and another wins the same number of GS in 10 years then my question is, who is better?
Certainly the one who wins them in shorter period of time. Nadal never won the singles gold in either it was Andy Murray who won back to back gold.
I think Nadal won singles hold in Juan Martin Del Porto. Rafa Nadal won an Olympic Gold medal in Beijing By the end of year , we will have this list slightly reordered.
We will have a man with golden slam, which means we will have another man with 20 slams, and new record of weeks at top. Go for it No1e!
Rafa now knows after thrashing Djokovic in the French Open Final, that the way to beat Djokovic is for Nadal to be aggressive with his strokes from the start, thereby not letting Djokovic dictate play with his ball placement.
The great Rafa Nadal is a massive 3 Grand Slam singles titles ahead of Djokovic and they both started around the same time. Vamos Rafa! Rafa has won 7 Grand Slam singles titles away from clay, the same number of Grand Slam singles titles that the great John McEnroe won in his whole career.
Therefore, Rafa is determined to win more Grand Slam singles titles away from clsy as he definitely has the game to do it.
Table of Contents. Related Posts. Aussie Tennis Fan October 12, Mr Anthony Mccluskey December 30, Both Rafael and roger won gold at the Rio Olympics?
Sure this was actually Andy Murray…. SportyTell December 31, Mary Simpson December 30, Oluseyi Folorunso December 31, Denis Shapovalov. Roberto Bautista Agut.
Pablo Carreno Busta. Grigor Dimitrov. Karen Khachanov. Felix Auger-Aliassime. Cristian Garin. Alex de Minaur.
United States. Filip Krajinovic. Great Britain. Lorenzo Sonego. Hubert Hurkacz. Adrian Mannarino. Jan-Lennard Struff.
Nikoloz Basilashvili. Miomir Kecmanovic. Albert Ramos-Vinolas. Richard Gasquet. Tennys Sandgren. Alexander Bublik.
Jordan Thompson. Alejandro Davidovich Fokina. Marton Fucsovics. Yoshihito Nishioka. Rod Laver is a player that many would consider as one the greatest of all time.
He won 11 grand slam titles and is the only player to twice win all the grand slams during the same calendar year. Rod Laver dominated the tennis world during the 60s and was ranked the world No.
With singles titles to his name, he also holds the record of most titles won in the history of tennis. Back in the 60ss, he was considered the best tennis player of all time.
There is not any player in the world that have achieved the same things as him in the same time frame. He is the youngest player of all time to win a grand slam title, when he won the French Open at the age of After that he won 10 more grand slam titles before retiring at the early age of There is no other player in the history of tennis that have won more grand slam titles before 25 than Björn borg.
What if he kept playing for another years? Maybe he would be considered the greatest of all time. Pete Sampras is the 4th greatest tennis player of all time.
He have dominated the tennis world during the 90s and was considered at his retirement in , the greatest tennis players of all time.
Hard to argue with that back then with a record holding 14 grand slam titles. However, with all those grand slam titles, he never won a French Open title.
The third greatest tennis player of all time has to be the Serbian Novak Djokovic. He is a prime example of what a late-bloomer is.
Between , Novak Djokovic won 9 out of 16 grand slams, Impressing? The 2th greatest player of all time is Rafael Nadal.
He have won 19 Grand Slam titles during his career, which makes him the 2th on that list as well. He may not be the overall greatest tennis player of all time, but he is most definitely the best tennis player to ever step on a clay court.
He will most likely surpass Roger Federer in the Grand Slam title rankings in a few years, should Nadal be considered the greatest of all time than?
The greatest tennis player of all time is Roger Federer.Roger has always played with the outmost professional conduct. Likewise Nadal. Which of the tennis greats did you expect would make this Cop Euro Salvatore Caruso. One on one results must be the deciding factor if most other criteria are close. Lower ranked players simply cannot pay for a large entourage and therefore may have a team of just a few. The main awards that are given out are for Grand Slam title trophies. You don't have to reply. Physical conditioning is just Bonuscode Pokerstars 2021 part of the equation along with all of the other things that make a player great; speed, agility, mental toughness, shot selection, strategy, etc. Ernests Gulbis. Yannick Hanfmann. Fantasy Frankcasino.